Problem

One of the many short comings of a majority of U.S. citizens is they believe there is a simple answer to every complicated problem. They can’t understand why the rest of the world doesn’t know this. Steven Horsford, though a Democrat, has this same problem. Have you seen his latest ad which has his solutions to all our problems? The man has no understanding of banking, the workings of the fed and the necessity of the bailouts of the automobile and financial industries. He has no intellectual ability or work history that would enable him to solve any of this state’s financial or political problems. He is the cheerleader for irrelevant platitudes regardless of party affiliation. He’s not competent to hold any public office; certainly not an office in the federal government.

“Rules of Conduct”

Horsford has two “Rules of Conduct”.  One for Horsford and one for everyone else.  He expects everyone to pay their bills but he doesn’t pay his.  The man has no understanding of money, how it’s made, how it is spent and what results should be expected from wise investing.  He certainly is not a person I’d ever let near my financial structure.  The perfect example of his misuse of funds is the state’s failure to maintain the physical conditions of its K-12 system. 

Sensitive To The Needs

I thought Horsford would be sensitive to the needs of Nevada’s African American population.  I thought his election as a Congressman would go far to satisfy those needs.  I couldn’t have been more mistaken.  The list of ten groups that Horsford represents consists of one name and one name only.  The name is Horsford.  There’s never been anyone or any group that Horsford represented other than himself.  

Best Interests Of The State?

Rather than tax businesses that send their Nevada profits out of state, Horsford voted to impose more sales taxes on Nevadans.  Horsford represents anyone who will support his candidacy for higher office rather than represent the best interests of the state.   

Heller/Berkley Debate

The Heller/Berkley debate was boring. That was no surprise. But while Berkley may have some shortcomings, Heller fails to get by, by basic standards for honesty. I got the feeling during the whole debate that he knew if the public understood how he was going to damage it with his 12th century views that he would not win the election. Therefore, he made a point of misleading the public on his positions. Heller is simply intellectually dishonest and therefore under no circumstances would get my vote.

Oceguera

John Oceguera is one Democrat, and there are very few, that will not get my vote. Even if Joe Heck were far less qualified than he is, Oceguera would still not get my vote. As you may know, Oceguera graduated from the UNLV Boyd School of Law. I asked him why he continued to be a fireman when he had a professional degree. His answer was simple. The pay of a fireman is greater than the pay of a lawyer. Something is wrong with this picture and Oceguera has always known it. While being in the leadership of the fire departments and knowing the outrageous pay of fireman he did nothing to stop it. That leads me to believe that Oceguera will always put his own interests before those of Nevada. Don’t vote for him. 

Horsford & Phone Calls.

It took me a long time but I finally figured out why Horsford doesn’t return phone calls. He knows that after thirty seconds of the conversation the person on the other end of the line will have correctly concluded that Horsford is all air.